- Published on
Trae vs Cline vs Cursor vs Windsurf, Which is the best?
- Authors
- Name
- Fast Smart Intelligence Blog
阅读中文版本:
AI代码编辑器对比 Trae, Cline, Cursor, Windsurf
In-Depth Comparison of AI Code Editors: Trae, Cline, Cursor, and Windsurf As AI technology rapidly advances, AI-powered code editors have become essential tools for developers seeking to boost productivity.
This article provides a detailed comparison of four leading AI code editors—Trae, Cline, Cursor, and Windsurf—across key dimensions such as features, pricing, and use cases.
A comprehensive comparison table is included to streamline your decision-making process.
Overview and Core Positioning
Developed by ByteDance, this AI-powered IDE supports Chinese, English, and Japanese.
It comes pre-integrated with the doubao-1.5-pro model and Deepseek-R1/Deepseek-V3 models, while also allowing users to specify custom models via API keys.
Its core advantage is being free to use.
Cline is an open-source, free AI IDE built on VS Code.
It emphasizes code security and cost control, enabling users to customize API keys for multi-model experimentation.
It is ideal for developers with strong technical backgrounds seeking flexibility in model integration.
A globally oriented tool rebuilt from VS Code, Cursor excels in multilingual support and precise contextual awareness.
It's Pro version is priced higher, with Pro Personal at 20/month, ProEnterprise at 40$/month.
It stands out in comprehensive capabilities, making it particularly suited for full-stack developers.
Cursor supports nearly all mainstream languages and development scenarios, offering advanced features and prioritizing code quality and best practices for experienced developers.
Focused on natural language interaction and development workflow automation, Windsurf rivals Cursor in performance.
Pricing includes Pro Personal at 15/month.
Most features work offline, and it excels in cross-file operations.
Windsurf is better suited for coding beginners, large-scale projects, or efficiency-focused developers, offering a user-friendly interface and highly accurate suggestions.
Comparison Table
| Category | Trae | Cline | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Open-source, free | Free tier limited; Pro: $40/month | Free tier limited; Pro: $15/month |
| Key Strengths | Chinese-language optimization, enterprise privatization | Multi-model support, code review sandbox | Multilingual development, VS Code ecosystem integration | Natural language interaction, real-time preview |
| Ideal Use Cases | Chinese projects, enterprise deployments, beginner guidance | Open-source maintenance, low-cost model testing | Complex refactoring, polyglot projects (e.g., Node.js + Go) | Rapid prototyping, UI iteration |
| Pros | - Superior Chinese NLP - Full development lifecycle coverage - Free + privatization | - Open-source flexibility - Multi-model experiments - Cost tracking | - Precise context awareness - Mature plugin ecosystem - Advanced debugging | - Intuitive UI - Real-time code preview - Automated workflows |
| Cons | - Occasional latency - Slow plugin initialization | - Relies on external APIs - Limited features | - Weak Chinese support - High subscription cost | - Struggles with complex tasks - Limited extensibility |
| Model Support | DeepSeek R1/V3, Claude 3.5, GPT-4o | OpenAI, DeepSeek (customizable) | Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4 derivatives | Claude 3.5 Sonnet, dynamic multi-model load balancing |
Recommended Scenarios & Use Cases
Trae
Recommended for: Chinese-language projects (e.g., e-commerce, payment modules), enterprise privatization deployment needs, budget-limited teams.
Example: Automatically injects security components when generating Alipay signature verification logic.
Cline
Recommended for: Open-source project maintenance, multi-model experimentation, teams prioritizing code security audits.
Example: Implements low-cost code review sandboxes by integrating external APIs.
Cursor
Recommended for: Multi-language hybrid development (e.g., TypeScript + Go), independent developers reliant on the VS Code ecosystem.
Example: Optimizes Node.js microservice architecture through multi-tab functionality.
Windsurf
Recommended for: Rapid prototyping, natural language-driven development, projects emphasizing interface simplicity.
Example: Generates responsive web code directly from Figma design mockups.
Future Trends & Summary
AI-powered code editors remain a niche field. Trae, leveraging ByteDance’s reputation and a free-tier strategy, has gained traction in the Chinese market while promoting its Doubao model.
Windsurf, with its focus on user interaction and rapid development, is catching up to—and even surpassing—Cursor in certain areas, demonstrating significant potential.
Cline, being open-source, has attracted developers to explore AI IDE development opportunities, fostering community-driven innovation. Open source remains a cornerstone of rapid progress in information technology.
Cursor excels in handling complex systems and customization demands, justifying its premium pricing with high-quality AI services.
Quick Guide:
For budget-conscious users or AI IDE newcomers: Try Trae or Cline.
For rapid idea validation (especially in web development): Windsurf’s agility shines.
For multi-stack complexity or large-scale system maintenance: Cursor is the top choice.
As more programmers embrace AI IDEs, these tools are empowering independent developers and boosting workplace efficiency across industries.